|
Judith Sheahan (Lindgren)
Susan, the time line you described (and helped us remember) makes sense. Like you, I was an educator for many years and understand the concern about a 2-day school week. I suspect the timing made the decision easier for the administration at that time. I do think there is value for students to discuss such crises in classrooms.
Our son was in high school when 9/11 occurred and each of his teachers provided time for discussion so students could ask questions, express concerns, and better understand what happened. But, that was 2001, not 1963 when people may not have understood the significant emotional impact such an event could have on young people. Back then, I also guess that teachers were less flexible when discussing current events if it was outside of their specialty. Chemistry teacher? Assasinating our president is not my field!
One of our classmates mentioned earlier in this thread that his chemistry teacher proceeded with a previously announced exam. That shocked me, but that is from my 2023 perspective. I am guessing this teacher had no idea how to discuss this assasination and perhaps thought he would be criticized for canceling the exam kids had prepared to take that day.
Just like the afternoon after the initial announcement, I have no recollection if teachers discussed this event when we returned to school after Thanksgiving week. But, I sure remember the stunned reaction I had hearing the announcemnt and the surreal atmosphere in the halls at the end of the day. I also remember the various reactions of our classmates--expressions of sadness, fear, feigned hysteria, and the immature glee some expressed for having school unexpectdly cancelled for three days. I imagine that over time, even the less mature or silly evloved in their feelings about that time.
|